The European Fee has launched a brand new directive that’s supported by each the European Council and Parliament. This directive is a serious step in addressing cyber-violence in opposition to ladies. It goals to forestall digital exploitation by criminalising actions comparable to sharing intimate photographs with out consent or on-line harassment.
Latest occasions, just like the widespread sharing of AI-generated pretend photographs of celebrities like Taylor Swift, present why this motion is urgently wanted.With hundreds of thousands uncovered to such digital hurt, the directive units an important customary for safeguarding everybody on-line.
“The most recent disgusting method of humiliating ladies is by sharing intimate photographs generated by AI in a few minutes by anyone. Such photos can do big hurt, not solely to pop stars however to each girl who must show at work or at dwelling that it was a deep pretend,” European Fee Vice President Věra Jourová informed Politico.
Individuals who fall sufferer to express deep fakes in Europe are presently going through a posh set of legal guidelines for defense, together with the EU’s privateness invoice, the GDPR, and varied nationwide legal guidelines. To simplify the method, social media giants comparable to X and Meta ought to take accountability and make it simpler for people to report dangerous content material and take away it rapidly. These measures needs to be included as a part of the EU’s Digital Providers Act (DSA).
Through the peak of the #MeToo motion in 2022, the Fee proposed a legislation to fight on-line abuse focused in the direction of ladies. The legislation’s major goal is to determine clear definitions of crimes like cyberstalking and suggest minimal jail phrases. The aim of this legislation is to make sure that all EU international locations have potent measures in place to handle and deal with these offences.
The proposed guidelines goal to crack down on a number of dangerous on-line behaviours. Firstly, they aim the non-consensual sharing of intimate photographs, together with deep fakes created utilizing AI expertise, to fight the troubling pattern of revenge porn. Moreover, cyber-stalking, on-line harassment, misogynous hate speech, and “cyber-flashing,” which entails sending unsolicited nude photographs, can even be deemed felony offences beneath these guidelines.
The directive can even require EU member states to arrange methods for folks to report cyber-violence simply and get help. The current surge in pornographic deep pretend photographs utilizing Taylor Swift’s face highlighted the urgency for motion. EU officers are pushing to get this legislation accepted quickly, with a deadline set for 2027 for member states to implement the brand new guidelines.
Final week, after the express AI-generated photographs of Taylor Swift took over the web, a bipartisan committee of US senators proposed Disrupt Specific Cast Photos and Non-Consensual Edits (DEFIANCE) Act, aiming to outlaw the sharing of AI-generated express photographs with out consent, Supported by lawmakers together with Dick Durbin, Lindsey Graham, Amy Klobuchar, and Josh Hawley, the invoice would permit people depicted in non-consensual AI-generated content material to hunt monetary compensation from those that produced or shared the fabric with out consent.
Latest occasions, just like the widespread sharing of AI-generated pretend photographs of celebrities like Taylor Swift, present why this motion is urgently wanted.With hundreds of thousands uncovered to such digital hurt, the directive units an important customary for safeguarding everybody on-line.
“The most recent disgusting method of humiliating ladies is by sharing intimate photographs generated by AI in a few minutes by anyone. Such photos can do big hurt, not solely to pop stars however to each girl who must show at work or at dwelling that it was a deep pretend,” European Fee Vice President Věra Jourová informed Politico.
Individuals who fall sufferer to express deep fakes in Europe are presently going through a posh set of legal guidelines for defense, together with the EU’s privateness invoice, the GDPR, and varied nationwide legal guidelines. To simplify the method, social media giants comparable to X and Meta ought to take accountability and make it simpler for people to report dangerous content material and take away it rapidly. These measures needs to be included as a part of the EU’s Digital Providers Act (DSA).
Through the peak of the #MeToo motion in 2022, the Fee proposed a legislation to fight on-line abuse focused in the direction of ladies. The legislation’s major goal is to determine clear definitions of crimes like cyberstalking and suggest minimal jail phrases. The aim of this legislation is to make sure that all EU international locations have potent measures in place to handle and deal with these offences.
The proposed guidelines goal to crack down on a number of dangerous on-line behaviours. Firstly, they aim the non-consensual sharing of intimate photographs, together with deep fakes created utilizing AI expertise, to fight the troubling pattern of revenge porn. Moreover, cyber-stalking, on-line harassment, misogynous hate speech, and “cyber-flashing,” which entails sending unsolicited nude photographs, can even be deemed felony offences beneath these guidelines.
The directive can even require EU member states to arrange methods for folks to report cyber-violence simply and get help. The current surge in pornographic deep pretend photographs utilizing Taylor Swift’s face highlighted the urgency for motion. EU officers are pushing to get this legislation accepted quickly, with a deadline set for 2027 for member states to implement the brand new guidelines.
Final week, after the express AI-generated photographs of Taylor Swift took over the web, a bipartisan committee of US senators proposed Disrupt Specific Cast Photos and Non-Consensual Edits (DEFIANCE) Act, aiming to outlaw the sharing of AI-generated express photographs with out consent, Supported by lawmakers together with Dick Durbin, Lindsey Graham, Amy Klobuchar, and Josh Hawley, the invoice would permit people depicted in non-consensual AI-generated content material to hunt monetary compensation from those that produced or shared the fabric with out consent.
