The actress had a distinct opinion on live-in relationships and marriage, and added, “Kitna bhi live-in kar lo, kya assure hai (What’s the assurance that even after living-in collectively your marriage can be successful)? Predominant toh kehti hoon, marriage hello nahin honi chahiye.What’s the have to tie your self down this present day? Why marry? For kids? Arrey, go on the market, discover the person who appeals to you, and get his child with out bodily intimacy. Zamana bahot aage chala gaya hai (the society had advanced).”
In an interview with Zoom, Mumtaz shared her divergent perspective on live-in relationships and marriage, suggesting that there isn’t any assurance of marital success even after residing collectively. She questioned the need of marriage in trendy instances, advocating for freedom from societal constraints. She proposed the concept of getting kids with out the formalities of marriage, emphasizing the evolving norms of society.
Zeenat Aman shares her views on live-in relationships, says ‘society is uptight about so many issues! Log kya kahenge?’
The actor identified for roles in ‘Roti’ and ‘Do Raaste’ advocated for elevating kids to be self-sufficient, notably encouraging daughters to know that they do not require a person to meet themselves. Reflecting on her personal expertise of over forty years of marriage, she emphasised the need of actively sustaining a wedding, acknowledging that it is not with out its challenges.
Mumtaz expressed her disagreement with Zeenat’s suggestion of live-in relationships, believing that Indian society is not ready for such preparations. She cautioned Zeenat concerning the potential influence of her recommendation, particularly contemplating her newfound social media prominence. Mumtaz emphasised the significance of adhering to ethical values moderately than pursuing reputation, urging warning in giving recommendation that contradicts societal norms.
She continued her argument, suggesting that widespread acceptance of live-in relationships may render the establishment of marriage out of date and irrelevant. Mumtaz questioned whether or not dad and mom can be keen to marry their sons to girls who had been in live-in relationships. Utilizing Zeenat’s personal expertise for example, Mumtaz highlighted the challenges Zeenat confronted in her marriage to Mazhar Khan after realizing him for years, implying that Zeenat’s personal marital struggles disqualify her from providing relationship recommendation.
Whereas Manisha Koirala declined to supply her opinion on the matter, stating that she would not contemplate herself an acceptable advisor on relationships, Celina Jaitly shared her perspective with the outlet. Jaitly expressed her perception that {couples} who cohabit usually discover it simpler to exit the connection. She advised that this ease of separation can result in a scarcity of effort in preserving the connection, because the dedication of marriage is just not current to encourage them to work by means of challenges.
In her put up, Zeenat highlighted society’s reservations relating to {couples} residing collectively earlier than marriage. She acknowledged that Indian society usually views such preparations as taboo, utilizing the colloquial phrase ‘residing in sin’ to explain them. Zeenat mirrored on the broader situation of societal judgment, questioning the importance of conforming to societal norms merely to keep away from criticism or gossip.
