Destiny of 23 lakh aspiring docs in limbo as SC is but to take a name on NEET re-exam: Here’s what we all know to date

0
16
Fate of 23 lakh aspiring doctors in limbo as SC is yet to take a call on NEET re-exam: Here is what we know so far

NEET UG 2024 SC Listening to: In its listening to at present, the Supreme Court docket confirmed that the Nationwide Eligibility cum Entrance Check (Undergraduate) examination (NEET) held on Could 5 was compromised as a consequence of a query paper leak. The Bench, comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, emphasised the necessity to decide the extent of the compromise to determine whether or not a retest is critical.The SC will now convene on the NEET UG 2024 matter on Thursday, July 11.

Will there be a re-examination for NEET UG 2024?

Responding to petitions calling for a re-examination, “The truth that the sanctity of the examination has been compromised is past doubt. Now, what’s the consequence of that leak would rely on the character of that leak. If it’s not intensive, then there is no such thing as a cancellation. Earlier than we order a retest, we have to be cautious. We’re coping with the careers of 23 lakh college students,” remarked CJI Chandrachud.
The Court docket outlined the parameters for deciding the necessity for a retest:

  • Whether or not the alleged breach occurred at a systemic stage.
  • Whether or not the breach impacts the integrity of all the examination course of.
  • Whether or not it’s potential to segregate the beneficiaries of the fraud from the untainted college students.
  • A retest could also be ordered if the breach is widespread and if it’s not potential to differentiate between tainted and untainted candidates.

Opposing the cancellation of the NEET UG 2024 examination held on Could 5, and conducting of a recent examination, the Centre and the NTA, not too long ago instructed the Supreme Court docket in separate affidavits that cancelling the examination could be “counterproductive” and “critically jeopardise” lakhs of sincere candidates within the absence of any proof of widespread breach of confidentiality.
Why are candidates demanding a re-test?
Petitioners argue that the malpractices undermine the ideas of equity enshrined in Article 14 of the Structure, which ensures the precise to equality. They declare that the paper leak offered an unfair benefit to sure candidates, disadvantageous to those that tried the examination truthfully.

Medical aspirants navigating troubled waters amid NEET UG 2024 counselling ambiguity

In the course of the listening to, the Supreme Court docket ordered the NTA to reply to some petitions however refused to halt counselling for admissions to medical faculties. “Allow us to not be in denial about what occurred,” CJI Chandrachud stated, including, “If the federal government doesn’t cancel the examination, what’s going to it do to seek out out who benefited from the query paper leak?”
CJI said that if an train is to be carried out by the NTA and the Union authorities, a coverage determination concerning the standing of NEET UG counselling have to be made by the federal government.
NEET UG 2024 was flawed from the start, none took discover
On Could 17, discover was issued within the lead petition titled ‘Vanshika Yadav v. Union of India,’ which sought to have the NEET UG exams carried out afresh as a result of alleged malpractices and paper leak. Whereas the Supreme Court docket refused to grant a keep on the NEET-UG 2024 outcomes, the bench led by CJI Chandrachud agreed to think about the matter and scheduled the listening to for after the summer time trip in July.
On June 4, the Nationwide Testing Company (NTA) introduced the NEET UG 2024 outcomes, notably 10 days prematurely from the scheduled launch date, revealing that 67 candidates scored an ideal 720, making them joint toppers. This 12 months noticed a rise in competitors, with 13.16 lakh candidates qualifying in comparison with 11.44 lakh in 2023. The announcement raised quite a few points amongst aspirants, together with examination irregularities, resulting in calls for for a re-exam.
Issues had been notably excessive concerning the right scores achieved by 67 college students, particularly as six of those college students had consecutive seat numbers and had been from the identical middle in Haryana, suggesting potential irregularities.