In 1975, NASA’s Viking programme made historical past when its twin landers turned the primary American spacecraft to efficiently attain the floor of Mars. These landers carried out pioneering experiments, amassing and analysing Martian soil samples for over six years in a quest to find out whether or not microbial life existed on the Pink Planet. Nonetheless, a provocative new idea means that the very strategies utilized in these experiments might have unintentionally killed potential life on Mars.
Life Detection Strategies Underneath Scrutiny
Dirk Schulze-Makuch, an astrobiologist on the Technische Universität Berlin, has proposed that the Viking experiments may need encountered Martian microbes however destroyed them by introducing liquid water. In a commentary printed in Nature Astronomy, Schulze-Makuch argued that Mars’ hyperarid atmosphere, drier than Earth’s Atacama Desert, possible harbours lifeforms tailored to extract moisture from salts within the ambiance. These organisms, if current, could possibly be fatally overwhelmed by the addition of liquid water, as used within the Viking experiments.
Misguided Assumptions About Water
The Viking programme assumed that Martian life, like life on Earth, would rely upon liquid water. The experiments added water and vitamins to the soil samples, monitoring for metabolic reactions. Whereas preliminary outcomes confirmed potential microbial exercise, they have been later dismissed as inconclusive. Schulze-Makuch believes these findings would possibly as a substitute point out the destruction of lifeforms tailored to Mars’ arid situations. He has urged adopting a “observe the salts” technique, which focuses on detecting organisms thriving in salt-driven moisture environments.
Shifting the Seek for Life
Highlighting parallels with Earth’s deserts, Schulze-Makuch pointed to proof of microbes in salt-rich areas surviving by way of a course of known as deliquescence, the place salts take in moisture to create brines. His proposal requires a number of life-detection strategies, together with AI-assisted motility evaluation and superior microscopes, to keep away from counting on water-based assumptions.
This idea challenges NASA’s longstanding strategy of trying to find water as the important thing to extraterrestrial life, urging a broader exploration technique. Whereas controversial, it opens a vital dialogue about refining methods to uncover life on Mars.
