Blake Lively asks judge for stronger protective order after receiving “violent” messages amid Justin Baldoni legal battle

headlines4Entertainment1 year ago1.6K Views

Blake Lively asks judge for stronger protective order after receiving “violent” messages amid Justin Baldoni legal battle

Actor Blake Lively.
| Photo Credit: Reuters

Actress Blake Lively has requested for “additional protections” in her ongoing legal battle with Justin Baldoni. As each side agreed to a protective order (PO), attorneys for the actress and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, submitted a letter to Judge Lewis J. Liman within the Southern District of New York, requesting a stronger PO than the courtroom’s “model” one, reported People.

Among their requests for the proposed PO, which in addition they filed in a separate doc, are “an Attorney’s Eyes Only” (‘AEO’) class, which applies to ‘Confidential Discovery Material of such a highly confidential and personal, sensitive, or proprietary nature that the revelation of such is likely to cause a competitive, business, commercial, financial, personal or privacy injury,’ as per the letter.

Lively and Reynolds’ attorneys went on to assert that “good cause exists for the Court to adopt the Proposed PO,” citing the actress’s not too long ago filed amended criticism towards Baldoni, as per People.

”As detailed in Ms Lively’s Amended Complaint, Ms Lively, her household, different members of the forged, varied truth witnesses, and people which have spoken out publicly in help of Ms Lively have obtained violent, profane, sexist, and threatening communications,” the letter states. Baldoni’s workforce shared in an announcement, “We do not condone dangerous rhetoric targeted toward anyone no matter the situation,” and stated they, too, have confronted threats in the course of the legal dispute.”

Anyone receiving violent messages by nameless events is abhorrent. When non-public events had been wrongfully accused by Lively and her paid workforce of wrongdoing, they obtained steady dying threats and visits to personal houses the place younger youngsters reside…. No one ought to should face that, particularly non-public events who shouldn’t have means for safety element.”

Lively, who filed a lawsuit towards Baldoni in December, has accused the director of sexual harassment and retaliation on the set of the upcoming 2024 movie. The judge, Lewis J. Liman, stated Monday that he’ll maintain an preliminary listening to on February 3.

At that listening to, Lively’s attorneys are anticipated to request an order prohibiting Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, from launching a public relations marketing campaign over the difficulty. Blake Lively’s lawsuit alleges that she and different forged and crew members of It Ends With Us skilled “invasive, unwelcome, unprofessional, and sexually inappropriate behaviour” from Baldoni on set.

She additional accuses him of retaliating towards her by working with a disaster PR workforce to hurt her fame. In response, Justin Baldoni has denied all allegations. Through his legal workforce, he has filed a USD 400 million lawsuit towards Blake Lively and her husband, actor Ryan Reynolds.

ALSO READ:Justin Baldoni launches web site to share his aspect in Blake Lively legal battle

Freedman has said that he intends to create a web site to supply proof refuting Lively’s harassment allegations. Lively’s attorneys search a protective injunction that may restrict the sharing of discovery supplies. They additionally need the judge to remind Freedman of his responsibility beneath skilled conduct tips.

Last week, Lively’s solicitors, led by Michael Gottlieb, requested a listening to “as soon as possible” to handle Freedman’s media claims. The judge agreed to maneuver the preliminary listening to date, which was initially deliberate for February 12, ahead 9 days, in keeping with the outlet. Liman plans to consolidate the 2 federal circumstances. On Monday, the judge requested the events to arrange a briefing schedule that may permit a trial to start on March 9, 2026.However, the date might be cancelled if the 2 attain a settlement earlier than.

Follow
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...