Salman Khurshid praises Article 370 transfer; BJP questions if Congress will ‘flip on him’ like Tharoor | India News

NEW DELHI: Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Friday questioned whether or not the Congress would now goal senior chief Salman Khurshid for what it known as “speaking an inconvenient truth” after celebration chief Shashi Tharoor confronted backlash from inside the grand-old celebration for supporting the Centre over Operation Sindoor stance.BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya, in a submit on X, pointed to Khurshid’s remarks through the ongoing multi-party MPs delegation tour, saying they signaled cross-party help for the federal government’s actions in Jammu & Kashmir and a agency stand on India’s sovereignty.“Mr Khurshid’s stance reflects bipartisan support for the Centre’s actions in Jammu & Kashmir, underscoring a broader sense of national unity against cross-border terrorism and a strong reaffirmation of India’s territorial integrity,” Malviya mentioned.“Will the Congress now turn on him for speaking an inconvenient truth, just as they did with Shashi Tharoor? Or is Tharoor being punished simply for daring to challenge the Gandhi camp’s chosen candidate for Congress President?” he requested.Former exterior affairs minister Khurshid, who’s in one of many 7 all-party delegations to reveal Pakistan submit Pahalgam terror assault, mentioned that prosperity and normalcy have returned to Jammu and Kashmir after abrogation of Article 370.“Kashmir had a major problem for a long time. Much of that was reflected in the thinking of the government in an article called Article 370 of the Constitution, which somehow gave the impression that it was separate from the rest of the country. But Article 370 was abrogated and it was finally put to an end,” Khurshid mentioned whereas addressing the Indonesian assume tanks and academia.“Subsequently, there was an election with 65% participation in the election. There’s an elected government in Kashmir today, and therefore, for people who want to undo everything that has happened, the prosperity that has come to Kashmir,” he added.This comes after Tharoor confronted criticism from celebration colleagues over his latest remarks on surgical strikes.Tharoor, at present main a multi-party delegation to international locations together with Panama and the US, had mentioned that India carried out its first cross-border surgical strike in 2016, a declare seen by many within the celebration as undermining comparable operations through the UPA period.Facing flak from Congress leaders corresponding to Pawan Khera and Udit Raj, Tharoor defended himself in a strongly worded submit on X from Panama City, clarifying that his remarks particularly referred to responses to terrorist assaults, to not prior wars or conflicts.“After a long and successful day in Panama, I have to wind up at midnight here with departure for Bogota, Colombia in six hours, so I don’t really have time for this — but anyway: For those zealots fulminating about my supposed ignorance of Indian valour across the LoC: in the past,” Tharoor mentioned in a submit on X.“I was clearly and explicitly speaking only about reprisals for terrorist attacks and not about previous wars and my remarks were preceded by a reference to the several attacks that have taken place in recent years alone, during which previous Indian responses were both restrained and constrained by our responsible respect for the LoC and the IB,” he added.Tharoor’s “India breached the LoC for the first time during the 2016 surgical strike” comment prompted a pointy response from his celebration colleague Udit Raj, who accused Tharoor of denigrating Congress’s legacy. “How could you denigrate the golden history of Congress by saying that before PM Modi, India never crossed the LoC and the International border?” Raj questioned.He went as far as to counsel Tharoor be made a “super spokesperson of the BJP.”Pawan Khera additionally weighed in, posting a screenshot from Tharoor’s e book, the place the MP had beforehand criticised the Modi authorities for politicising the 2016 strikes whereas acknowledging that the Congress had authorised a number of such operations prior to now with out publicising them. NEW DELHI: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Friday questioned whether or not the Congress would now goal senior chief Salman Khurshid for what it known as “speaking an inconvenient truth” after celebration chief Shashi Tharoor confronted backlash from inside the grand-old celebration for the Centre over Operation Sindoor stance.BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya, in a submit on X, pointed to Khurshid’s remarks through the ongoing multi-party MPs delegation tour, saying they signaled cross-party help for the federal government’s actions in Jammu & Kashmir and a agency stand on India’s sovereignty.“Mr Khurshid’s stance reflects bipartisan support for the Centre’s actions in Jammu & Kashmir, underscoring a broader sense of national unity against cross-border terrorism and a strong reaffirmation of India’s territorial integrity,” Malviya mentioned.“Will the Congress now turn on him for speaking an inconvenient truth, just as they did with Shashi Tharoor? Or is Tharoor being punished simply for daring to challenge the Gandhi camp’s chosen candidate for Congress President?” he requested.Former exterior affairs minister Khurshid, who’s in one of many 7 all-party delegations to reveal Pakistan submit Pahalgam terror assault, mentioned that prosperity and normalcy have returned to Jammu and Kashmir after abrogation of Article 370.“Kashmir had a major problem for a long time. Much of that was reflected in the thinking of the government in an article called Article 370 of the Constitution, which somehow gave the impression that it was separate from the rest of the country. But Article 370 was abrogated and it was finally put to an end,” Khurshid mentioned whereas addressing the Indonesian assume tanks and academia.“Subsequently, there was an election with 65% participation in the election. There’s an elected government in Kashmir today, and therefore, for people who want to undo everything that has happened, the prosperity that has come to Kashmir,” he added.This comes after Tharoor confronted criticism from celebration colleagues over his latest remarks on surgical strikes.Tharoor, at present main a multi-party delegation to international locations together with Panama and the US, had mentioned that India carried out its first cross-border surgical strike in 2016, a declare seen by many within the celebration as undermining comparable operations through the UPA period.Facing flak from Congress leaders corresponding to Pawan Khera and Udit Raj, Tharoor defended himself in a strongly worded submit on X from Panama City, clarifying that his remarks particularly referred to responses to terrorist assaults, to not prior wars or conflicts.“After a long and successful day in Panama, I have to wind up at midnight here with departure for Bogota, Colombia in six hours, so I don’t really have time for this — but anyway: For those zealots fulminating about my supposed ignorance of Indian valour across the LoC: in the past,” Tharoor mentioned in a submit on X.“I was clearly and explicitly speaking only about reprisals for terrorist attacks and not about previous wars and my remarks were preceded by a reference to the several attacks that have taken place in recent years alone, during which previous Indian responses were both restrained and constrained by our responsible respect for the LoC and the IB,” he added.Tharoor’s “India breached the LoC for the first time during the 2016 surgical strike” comment prompted a pointy response from his celebration colleague Udit Raj, who accused Tharoor of denigrating Congress’s legacy. “How could you denigrate the golden history of Congress by saying that before PM Modi, India never crossed the LoC and the International border?” Raj questioned.He went as far as to counsel Tharoor be made a “super spokesperson of the BJP.”Pawan Khera additionally weighed in, posting a screenshot from Tharoor’s e book, the place the MP had beforehand criticised the Modi authorities for politicising the 2016 strikes whereas acknowledging that the Congress had authorised a number of such operations prior to now with out publicising them.