Will a two-tiered World Test Championship do more harm than good?

headlines4Cricket3 months ago1.6K Views

A proposal to restructure the World Test Championship (WTC) into a two-tiered system, probably dividing the 12 Test-playing nations into two teams of six groups, or into two teams of seven and 5 groups, is gaining traction. While some argue that this technique might enhance the standard of matches and improve competitiveness by having prime groups play one another more usually, others fear that lower-ranked groups will get fewer alternatives to play. Will a two-tiered WTC do more harm than good? Deep Dasgupta and Jatin Paranjape focus on the query in a dialog moderated by Amol Karhadkar. Edited excerpts:

Will a two-tiered World Test Championship do more harm than good?
Is this proposal truly anticipated to profit Test cricket?

Deep Dasgupta: I wrote for Sportstar in 2017 in favour of the proposal, so I’m an advocate. The high quality of the India-England Test collection might not have been nice, however as a result of it was aggressive, it had everybody’s consideration. Test cricket shall be watched by folks so long as it’s aggressive. Obviously, we are able to’t count on folks to observe it on all 5 days, for seven hours every day. But whether it is aggressive, folks will observe it more usually. With a two-tiered WTC, you’ll have a more aggressive collection and more folks following Test matches once more.

Jatin Paranjape: Today, more folks devour the T20 (Twenty-20) format of cricket. But having mentioned that, shopper behaviour has advanced quickly: there may be a area of interest group of individuals supporting Test cricket as properly. They observe and recognize the intricacies of Test cricket.

So, the time has come for the ICC (International Cricket Council) to launch Test cricket as a product. They must be conscious of the truth that whereas all of the media consideration is across the T20 sport, the scores in the course of the India-England Test collection went via the roof. And that launch must be a pleased marriage of preserving the philosophical precedence of Test cricket alive with the industrial angle.

I’m not towards the two-tier format, however it shouldn’t be skewed in direction of redistribution of commerce; it ought to be skewed in direction of redistribution of alternative for all of the groups, in order that they’ve a affordable stab at Test cricket. It ought to incentivise groups within the second tier to enhance their sport.

Will a two-tiered World Test Championship do more harm than good?
At the second, the WTC includes solely 9 of the 12 Test-playing nations. Each crew performs six collection, primarily to keep away from pitting India and Pakistan towards one another. How are you able to re-jig the format or make the prevailing format more fan-friendly?

Deep Dasgupta: The main concern with a two-tier system with six groups in every tier is that a lot of the groups would possibly say, ‘I am not going to play second tier’. It turns into a little bit of a problem. So let’s say they’re divided as seven (in prime tier) and 5 (within the backside) and we keep on with the present format, which is six collection in a cycle. If you could have seven groups in Tier 1, routinely you play six different groups (in a cycle). Whether it’s India-Pakistan, I feel that’s a completely different concern. That’s above my pay grade, so I’m not going to get into that bit. That can occur every time it occurs and regardless of the powers are, they may resolve.

Once Test cricket is bought as high quality product — the India-England collection was a nice advocate for that — then additionally, you will get income from it. And then you may create a Test fund. A significant chunk of it could go into organising Test collection for groups within the second tier. One of the key explanation why many Test-playing nations don’t play many Test matches is the industrial side. A collection with 5 T20s is more commercially viable than one with three Test matches. If the ICC comes up with a Test fund, that would assist.

Jatin Paranjape: Your calendar dictates what you may and can’t do. There is a finite variety of days inside which you could drive this sport ahead. It’s humorous that immediately, when you consider the calendar, you consider the IPL (Indian Premier League) first after which take a look at what’s left after that. The ICC must determine what the 2 most necessary codecs are, out of the three codecs. ODI (One Day International) cricket must be checked out. The quantity of inane ODI cricket being performed immediately at a bilateral degree shouldn’t be good for the sport or the broadcaster. I don’t assume it represents any worth for the patron both. So in the event that they take a look at what number of days they’ve accessible as a part of the calendar, then allow them to prioritise T20 cricket and Test cricket as the 2 foremost focus areas. The ICC has to have a difficult dialog with a number of stakeholders forward of the 2027 cycle. The folks on the prime of the ICC are canny industrial operators. Jay Shah (ICC Chairman) will need to prioritise Test cricket and must discover the appropriate option to do it.

Will a two-tiered World Test Championship do more harm than good?
Perhaps with a watch on the subsequent ICC broadcasting rights cycle (2027-2031), the ICC in July shaped a working group headed by former New Zealand batter, Roger Twose, to look into all points of the subsequent WTC. If Twose calls both of you, what would you counsel?

Deep Dasgupta: First, work out a window for Test cricket. For that to occur, management the unfold of franchise cricket. You see 29-year-old high quality cricketers retiring from worldwide cricket; these are all clearly interconnected points. Look at home windows the place more and more Test cricket might be performed. The two-tier system makes a lot of sense in such home windows.

Jatin Paranjape: The ICC is the custodian of the sport and custodians at all times have a long-term view on issues. So nothing must be mounted within the subsequent yr or two. The path must be clear: over the subsequent five-seven years, how are we going to have 12 actually sturdy Test-playing nations? One means is to take a look at the tier two groups proper now and create a league for them. Create a league whereby after a sure degree, two or three groups out of these 5 – 6 are switched towards tier one groups. That provides the spectators in these different nations one thing to look ahead to.

Deep Dasgupta: That is a nice thought. Five groups in tier two can play one another over a interval of a month and a half or two months.

Will a two-tiered World Test Championship do more harm than good?
Can you counsel the best strategy for the BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India), the ECB (England and Wales Cricket Board), and Cricket Australia — the three prime boards that management the Test calendar and income — to make the two-tier Test system work?

Jatin Paranjape: There isn’t a more opportune time than this: the pinnacle of the ICC is the previous head of the BCCI. A whole lot of adjustments might be made as a result of there may be the muscle to do it. When I say muscle, I imply it in a great way, in a means that the place you need to promote the sport, the place you need to add industrial longevity to the sport.

Let us not underestimate the facility of the patron. The shopper should really feel enthused that Test cricket is properly sorted; that there’s the dopamine repair with the T20 format, however there may be additionally a improbable Test cricket calendar yr on yr, which goes to evolve into strengthening the tier two groups.

I additionally really feel the ICC will miss a possibility in the event that they don’t type an advisory committee of a number of the prime gamers who’ve been large proponents of Test cricket or champions in Test cricket. No disrespect to Roger Twose, however gamers corresponding to Sachin Tendulkar, Alastair Cook, and Ricky Ponting must be a part of the decision-making course of.

Deep Dasgupta: I’m glad that we’re speaking and everyone seems to be speaking about this. We have seen the time when no one was actually bothered about Test cricket. Once we settle for the truth that there are challenges, and we have to do one thing, I’m certain there shall be options.

Jatin Paranjape: Let me speak in regards to the shopper once more. Let us not overlook that the patron can be usually an aspiring cricketer. If youngsters don’t need to play red-ball cricket, they need to play white-ball cricket. You want to have the ability to contact them not directly, you want to have the ability to encourage them with the truth that Test cricket is being given precedence that’s comparable to what’s given to T20 cricket. If you repair cricket from an organisational perspective, but when your new gamers don’t need to play Test cricket, then you could have a downside once more. You have to launch Test cricket as a product. The goal could possibly be that by 2036, we now have we now have 14 actually sturdy Test nations.

Will a two-tiered World Test Championship do more harm than good?
Any parting ideas?

Deep Dasgupta: For us, Test cricket is probably the most favoured format. Since everyone seems to be speaking about bettering it, issues will fall into place.

Jatin Paranjape: There must be a long-term view. The BCCI must shepherd this complete dialog. It doesn’t must be a dictator, however it must shepherd this complete dialog. Without a definitive perspective from the BCCI, we’ll be having the identical chat two years down the street.

Listen to the dialog

Deep Dasgputa, former Test cricketer, and cricket broadcaster; Jatin Paranjape, ODI cricketer-turned-sports advertising and marketing skilled and member of the BCCI’s Cricket Advisory Committee

Follow
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...