BOSTON: Alphabet’s Google is about to go earlier than a federal jury in Boston on Tuesday in a trial over accusations that processors it makes use of to energy synthetic intelligence know-how in key merchandise infringe a pc scientist’s patents.
Singular Computing, based by Massachusetts-based pc scientist Joseph Bates, claims Google copied his know-how and used it to help AI options in Google Search, Gmail, Google Translate and different Google providers.
A Google court docket submitting mentioned that Singular has requested as much as $7 billion in financial damages, which might be greater than double the largest-ever patent infringement award in US historical past.
Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda known as Singular’s patents “doubtful” and mentioned that Google developed its processors “independently over a few years.”
“We stay up for setting the file straight in court docket,” Castaneda mentioned.
An legal professional for Singular declined to touch upon the case.
The trial is predicted to final two to 3 weeks.
Singular’s 2019 grievance mentioned Bates shared his computer-processing improvements with Google between 2010 and 2014. Singular mentioned Google’s Tensor Processing Models, which improve the tech big’s AI capabilities, copy Bates’ know-how and infringe two patents.
The lawsuit mentioned that Google’s circuits use an improved structure Bates found that enables for higher processing energy and has “revolutionized the best way AI coaching and inference are completed.”
Google launched its processing items in 2016 to energy AI used for speech recognition, content material technology, advert advice and different features. Singular mentioned that variations 2 and three of the items, launched in 2017 and 2018, violate its patent rights.
Google informed the court docket in December that its processors work in several methods than Singular’s patented know-how and that the patents are invalid.
“Google engineers had blended emotions concerning the know-how and the corporate finally rejected it, explicitly telling Dr. Bates that his concept was not proper for the kind of purposes Google was growing,” Google mentioned in a court docket submitting.
A US appeals court docket in Washington additionally will hear arguments on Tuesday about whether or not to invalidate Singular’s patents in a separate case that Google appealed from the US Patent and Trademark Workplace.
Singular Computing, based by Massachusetts-based pc scientist Joseph Bates, claims Google copied his know-how and used it to help AI options in Google Search, Gmail, Google Translate and different Google providers.
A Google court docket submitting mentioned that Singular has requested as much as $7 billion in financial damages, which might be greater than double the largest-ever patent infringement award in US historical past.
Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda known as Singular’s patents “doubtful” and mentioned that Google developed its processors “independently over a few years.”
“We stay up for setting the file straight in court docket,” Castaneda mentioned.
An legal professional for Singular declined to touch upon the case.
The trial is predicted to final two to 3 weeks.
Singular’s 2019 grievance mentioned Bates shared his computer-processing improvements with Google between 2010 and 2014. Singular mentioned Google’s Tensor Processing Models, which improve the tech big’s AI capabilities, copy Bates’ know-how and infringe two patents.
The lawsuit mentioned that Google’s circuits use an improved structure Bates found that enables for higher processing energy and has “revolutionized the best way AI coaching and inference are completed.”
Google launched its processing items in 2016 to energy AI used for speech recognition, content material technology, advert advice and different features. Singular mentioned that variations 2 and three of the items, launched in 2017 and 2018, violate its patent rights.
Google informed the court docket in December that its processors work in several methods than Singular’s patented know-how and that the patents are invalid.
“Google engineers had blended emotions concerning the know-how and the corporate finally rejected it, explicitly telling Dr. Bates that his concept was not proper for the kind of purposes Google was growing,” Google mentioned in a court docket submitting.
A US appeals court docket in Washington additionally will hear arguments on Tuesday about whether or not to invalidate Singular’s patents in a separate case that Google appealed from the US Patent and Trademark Workplace.
