The Players’ balcony inside the terracotta-coloured pavilion, constructed some 135 years in the past. The picture of Kapil Dev, toothy grin and all, receiving the Prudential World Cup Trophy on 25 June 1983. The unforgettable sight of Sourav Ganguly whipping off his shirt and waving it over his head repeatedly on 13 July 2002, slightly over six years after his century on Test debut at the identical venue, after younger turks Yuvraj
Singh and Mohammad Kaif orchestrated a surprising assault on England’s 325 in the ultimate of the NatWest Trophy tri-series.
The Lord’s Cricket Ground, or just Lord’s, has been the stage of many a spectacular Indian show over the final 93 years. India performed their first Test right here, in 1932, and introduced their intention by way of their pace retailers Amar Singh, Mohammad Nissar and Jahangir Khan, who took 14 of the 18 residence wickets to fall whilst Col. C.Ok. Nayudu’s males went down by 158 runs. The begin may not have been propitious, however India have had nice purpose to mirror on their trysts with Lord’s with fondness.
Everywhere round the perimeter, one is continually uncovered to the ‘Home of Cricket’ moniker. Lord’s is the headquarters of the England and Wales Cricket Board – the International Cricket Council additionally was once housed right here for 96 years, till 2005 – and prides itself on its strict adherence to custom, although in line with the calls for of the trendy occasions, it has allowed itself to be refurbished with out compromising on its old-world appeal.
It’s right here that England and India will renew battle in what should be a compelling third act of a five-part showdown. The honours are even – India responded to a five-wicket loss in Leeds with a commanding 336-run win in Birmingham – and subsequently, there may be the whole lot to play for. For all the apprehensions {that a} younger Indian aspect beneath a first-time captain can be overrun by an skilled and settled residence workforce, Shubman Gill’s outfit has acquitted itself creditably, outbatting the English at varied levels and comprehensively outbowling them at Edgbaston even with out the rested genius of Jasprit Bumrah.
Around the closeness of the sequence, there have been two main speaking factors — the nature of the surfaces, and the high quality of the Dukes balls. Neither of these matters is prone to fade into the background over the subsequent 5 days.
To nobody’s shock, the character of Test pitches in England have drastically modified in the final three years, since the coming collectively of the administration group of Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum. When Stokes took over the captaincy from Joe Root, English Test cricket was at its lowest ebb — only one victory in 17 matches, culminating in a sequence loss in the Caribbean. The aggressive Stokes and the equally constructive McCullum made a spectacular shift from the conventional, dumping an ultra-conservative strategy for a diametrically reverse standpoint steeped in positivity and supreme self-belief.
Like Eoin Morgan had handpicked gamers to style a title-winning squad in the immediacy of England’s first-round elimination from the 2015 World Cup, Stokes and McCullum unearthed personnel that may match their template as an alternative of altering their blueprint to accommodate the current personnel. It appealed to everybody remotely related to English cricket – the followers, hitherto disillusioned, the directors, who have been delighted that the new-found strategy was bringing the followers again and sending the coffers hovering, and an excitable media that was surprisingly pliant when it got here to overlooking excesses.
LONDON, ENGLAND – JULY 09: Ben Stokes of England carries a chair after a workforce {photograph} was taken earlier than the third Rothesay Test match in opposition to India at Lord’s Cricket Ground on July 09, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Philip Brown/Getty Images)
| Photo Credit:
Philip Brown
Flatter surfaces
One of the inevitable offshoots of the model of cricket labelled Bazball – McCullum goes by ‘Baz’ together with his buddies – was a flattening out of the pitches. Surfaces as they as soon as existed in England wouldn’t facilitate plans that revolved round scoring at 4.5 runs an over and utilizing time and scoreboard stress to harry and hustle opponents. Where England was as soon as a check of character and approach of batters, it quickly turned a graveyard for bowlers. Even a virtuoso like James Anderson, Test cricket’s main non-spinner wicket-taker, was pushed to time period one of such tracks – in Birmingham in 2023 – as his ‘kryptonite’ for the singular lack of even token help. For all the discuss of 20 wickets being important to profitable a Test match, England’s success has stemmed from their batting muscle, which does make for thrilling motion.
At occasions, England have seemed foolish and rigidly uncompromising, joyful to court docket defeat in pursuit of glory when prudence dictated holding their horses. There is a definite philosophy that frowns upon taking part in for attracts; in some way, even in Test cricket, England really feel it’s all proper to lose when nearly everybody else will set ego or no matter one desires to name it apart and knuckle right down to grind out a stalemate. Again, that tack hasn’t attracted an excessive amount of criticism.
Batters these days aren’t challenged half as a lot as in the previous in England, when a mix of swinging balls and beneficiant lateral motion stored Nos. 3, 4 and 5 on the edge of their seats even earlier than the openers took guard. The flattening out of pitches has taken the dread — if that’s the proper phrase — of the new ball out of the equation, which is not any disrespect to the likes of Yashasvi Jaiswal and Ok.L. Rahul, Ben Duckett and Ollie Pope.
England haven’t simply wanted good batting tracks to espouse their fashion, they’ve wanted these surfaces to stay good for batting for the period of the recreation. Because they fancy searching down any goal in the fourth innings – and who is to seek out fault, on condition that their two highest profitable chases (378 and 371) have are available in the final three years – they have an inclination to subject first when commonsense would dictate batting. The ends have justified the means most of the time, together with in Leeds when 371 was reined in at a canter, however when there may be even a nominal spanner in the works, England’s administration group hasn’t been averse to talking its thoughts.
Making pitches to go well with the residence workforce will not be a novelty. In some quarters, it’s referred to, not complimentarily, as ‘pitch-doctoring’. England’s religion in sustained batting beauties can be a type of pitch-doctoring, even when it doesn’t entice the identical censure as a floor in India which could assist the spinners from ball one and stay that approach for the period of the recreation, nonetheless lengthy that may be, even when the flip is constant and the bounce true. But that’s a narrative for an additional day.
The Birmingham floor, which deteriorated barely however not alarmingly, didn’t go down properly with England. There has been a clamour for a ‘more lively’ monitor at Lord’s, no matter that may be interpreted as. Lively as in additional tempo? More seam motion? Greater carry? Guess one has to attend and watch.
As a lot as the pitches, the balls getting used have come beneath critical flak. Almost everybody who has spoken to the media over the final three weeks has lamented the Dukes going smooth after 30 or 35 overs, and shedding form even earlier than that stage. Whether it’s simply because of the approach the ball is being made, or whether or not it’s as a result of of the flat, onerous surfaces on which the ball takes a good quantity of pounding when it’s bashed in, is open to query.
“In this series, from what I’ve seen, the ball is getting deshaped too much,” Rishabh Pant, India’s vice-captain whose ball-bashing might have one thing to do with the ball getting out of form, agreed on Wednesday. “That has never happened earlier. It’s definitely irritating for the players because every ball plays differently. When it becomes softer, sometimes it’s not doing too much. But as soon as the ball is changed, it starts to do enough. As a batsman, you’ve got a challenge adjusting to it. But at the same time, I feel it’s not good for cricket anyway (the balls losing shape).”
As unacceptable as the ball going out of form is the lack of swing up entrance, which additional takes the bowlers out of the equation. India’s quicks have exploited the new balls higher; in Birmingham, they picked up wickets with the first new ball in each innings and sparked a collapse of 5 for 20 in the first innings with the second new cherry, so possibly it’s a feather in the cap of the Indian batters that they haven’t misplaced wickets in a cluster to the new ball. But whereas there may be nonetheless a modicum of risk at the begin of an innings, that risk stage drops alarmingly when the ball ages and will get to the 35-over mark or so.
“We’re not the only (having issues with the ball),” Stokes noticed. “Whenever we have touring teams come here, there is an issue around the balls going soft, going completely out of shape. I don’t even think that the rings that we use (used to see if the balls have gone out of shape) are the Dukes rings. It’s something that isn’t ideal, but you’ve got to deal with it.”
Different international locations use completely different manufacturers of cricket balls. The Aussie-origin Kookaburra is the hottest, utilized in Test cricket in a number of elements of the world and for now having fun with unique monopoly in all white-ball internationals. In India, the most popular red-ball weapon of destruction is the SG Test whereas right here in England, it has been the Dukes for a very long time. Perhaps the authorities will maintain the ball producers to better accountability, given how widespread the criticism of the balls getting used for this sequence has been.
The one distinctive characteristic of Lord’s is the 2.5-metre slope that runs the breadth of the floor. For batters and bowlers alike taking part in right here for the first time, it may be an enormous battle, combating the slope. Balls that may be left alone on line anyplace can simply have a ‘W’ written on them, whereas bowlers typically wrestle to bowl each with and in opposition to the slope. It may seem solely a tiny part, however what’s it they are saying about appearances being misleading?
