Discretion is the best part of valour, Karnataka High Court reminds makers of Thug Life film

A view of the High Court of Karnataka.
| Photo Credit:

The High Court of Karnataka on Friday requested actor Kamal Haasan’s Raajkamal Films International (RKFI), Chennai, to file its assertion of objections, if any, in opposition to the functions filed by the Kannada Sahitya Parishat (KSP) and an advocate, who need to be part of proceedings in its petition looking for safety for the launch of the Tamil film Thug Life in Karnataka.

Justice M. Nagaprasanna handed the order whereas adjourning additional listening to until June 20 on the petition, filed by the RKFI, which had additionally sought a course to retrain the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) from issuing any instruction in relation to banning launch and distribution of Thug Life in Karnataka as the KFCC had demanded an apology from Mr. Haasan for his controversial assertion that “Kannada is born out of Tamil”. Mr. Haasan is one of the administrators of the RKFI.

‘Stupid statement’

Earlier, Senior Advocate S. Basavaraj, who appeared for the KSP, termed as a “stupid statement” the actor’s comment on Kannada, whereas inserting some books earlier than the courtroom on historic background of the language.

Mr. Basavaraj additionally questioned how an individual, who set his home on fireplace can search the assist from the courtroom to douse the blaze, whereas declaring that opposition for the launch the film was a outcome of his assertion on Kannada with none foundation.

“Again, I am repeating, discretion is the best part of valour,” the decide orally informed the petitioner’s advocate whereas adjourning the listening to, to which the petitioner’s advocate mentioned he would convey it to the petitioner.

Earlier observations

During an earlier listening to on June 3, the courtroom had mentioned it was “of the prima facie opinion that, if a sentence of apology had been included while concluding the communication [from Mr. Haasan to the KFCC], it would have concluded/ended all controversy and the unrest or disharmony in the State of Karnataka” on launch of the film.

Also, the courtroom on June 5 adjourned the listening to as the petitioner’s advocate had mentioned the screening of the film wouldn’t be insisted upon until the dialogue/trialogue with the KFCC to resolve the subject after Mr. Haasan selected to not go by the suggestion made by the courtroom to apologise to place an finish to the controversy.