Sourav Ganguly Invited To Join Teachers Protest Over SSC Scam. He Says “Don’t…”

A gaggle of lecturers, who misplaced their jobs after a latest Supreme Court verdict on the WBSSC recruitment rip-off, went to Sourav Ganguly’s home on Thursday to ask him to a march to the West Bengal state secretariat. However, in keeping with a report by ABP Ananda, the previous Indian cricket workforce skipper has turned down their invitation. The lecturers went to Ganguly’s residence in Kolkata to ask him for the march that can tackle place on April 21 however in keeping with the report, Ganguly responded – “Please don’t involve me in politics”. 

Stressing that college students should not undergo, the Supreme Court at this time stated West Bengal lecturers whose appointments had been cancelled earlier this month resulting from irregularities in recruitment can proceed to show until the recent choice course of is accomplished. This aid, nevertheless, is just for ‘untainted’ lecturers — these whose names weren’t linked to any irregularity throughout the investigation into the 2016 appointments. Also, the aid is for lecturers of Class 9, 10, 11 and 12. 

The Supreme Court, nevertheless, set a deadline for the Bengal School Service Commission (SSC). Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna stated the SSC should launch ads for the recent recruitment drive by May 31 and the choice course of should conclude by December 31.

“We are inclined to accept the prayer made in the application in so far as it relates to the assistant teachers of classes 9 and 10 and classes 11 and 12. Subject to following conditions that the ad for fresh recruitment shall be out by May 31 and the exam, including the entire process, shall be done by December 31.”

“The state government and the commission shall file an affidavit in or before May 31, enclosing the ad copy as well as the schedule so as to ensure the completion of the recruitment process by December 31. In case the ad is not published as directed, appropriate orders shall be passed, including imposition of costs,” the Chief Justice stated.