Students, experts flag big errors in JEE Main papers

NEW DELHI: National Testing Agency (NTA), already underneath scrutiny over its conduct of aggressive exams in latest years, faces contemporary allegations of significant errors in JEE Main papers of April 2025.
After the discharge of reply keys, query papers and recorded responses, college students from Kota – the nation’s teaching capital – have flagged at the least 9 disputed questions in physics, chemistry and arithmetic papers. Expert evaluations from main institutes again these claims, including gasoline to rising criticism of NTA’s competence and transparency.
Among the objections raised, 4 are from physics, three from chemistry, and two from arithmetic. Experts say these should not minor ambiguities however outright factual errors. A director of a training centre said that “objections have been submitted with evidence,” urging NTA to award bonus marks or drop the flawed questions altogether. One such instance, cited by a physics professional, includes a query on hydrogen-like ions the place NTA’s answer assumes an atomic variety of 2, whereas it needs to be 3. Another query on present electrical energy lists 125mA as the proper reply as an alternative of the particular studying of 5mA. A 3rd query on equal resistance supplied no appropriate possibility in any respect.
“It’s unacceptable that such basic mistakes are creeping into national-level exams,” tweeted @kamath_pramod, an educator and commentator, whose detailed breakdowns of the disputed questions have gone viral on X. In certainly one of his posts, he wrote, “Q on modern physics from 7 April AM shift is conceptually flawed. If NTA doesn’t correct this, it’s injustice to lakhs of students.”
Many college students are echoing this sentiment. “After months of prep, this is what we get? Blunders in physics, chemistry, and even maths?” wrote @kajalmishra2002. Some have known as for accountability and a clear audit of NTA’s paper-setting course of.
This is just not an remoted incident. NTA has confronted growing backlash over the previous yr, significantly following technical glitches in CUET-UG 2024, errors in NEET UG reply keys, and opaque objection-handling protocols. Each controversy has amplified calls for for a regulatory overhaul. “We need to question the quality control mechanisms in place,” tweeted @KumarMr51.
Students and training establishments at the moment are ready for NTA’s official response to the objections. But religion in the company’s credibility has already taken a success. With the stakes of JEE Main larger than ever – the place even a single mark can drastically alter a candidate’s future – strain is mounting on NTA to not solely acknowledge its errors however to institute deep systemic reforms.