Musk had said, “He (Agrawal) is a very nice man, however managers shouldn’t intention to be preferred. What Twitter wants is a fire-breathing dragon, and Parag shouldn’t be that.” This “fire-breathing dragon” idea represents a pacesetter who’s fiercely aggressive and uncompromising of their pursuit of success. Nonetheless in accordance with an ET report, many leaders and consultants argue that such an method shouldn’t be sustainable.
As Rishad Premji of Wipro said final 12 months, “Essentially the most harmful individuals in organizations are those that are extremely profitable however go away 1,000 lifeless our bodies on the best way whereas they succeed.” This highlights the potential unfavourable penalties of ruthless management.
Rashi Narang, the founding father of Heads Up For Tails, emphasizes that leaders of this nature could not worth empathy.
Narang the founding father of the pet merchandise enterprise value Rs 140 crore, believes that some managers don’t worth qualities like kindness, empathy, and persistence, perceiving them as indicators of ‘weak point.’ Such managers prioritize a get-the-job-done-at-any-cost method, probably hindering their groups’ capability to be taught from failures, she says.
Elon Musk: Canada authorities crushing free speech
The standard picture of a fire-breathing dragon supervisor, recognized for his or her assertive and aggressive type, is dealing with rising scrutiny. Vineeta Singh, co-founder and CEO of SUGAR Cosmetics, notes that though there was a historic perception within the want for such assertive leaders, it is changing into evident that leaders who encourage and interact with their groups are inclined to navigate the complexities of contemporary enterprise extra successfully.
Whereas there’s a lack of Indian research on the consequences of demanding bosses, a 2018 examine from Binghamton College within the US discovered that displaying compassion towards staff motivated them to carry out higher.
Feroza Engineer, a management improvement skilled, emphasizes the position of organizational tradition in shaping management. She highlights that management shouldn’t be considered in isolation however fairly as a set of expertise that align with the corporate’s tradition. A cutthroat, extremely performance-driven tradition with little work-life stability is prone to affect the management type, she believes.
Management preferences are additionally influenced by varied elements, together with international uncertainty, geopolitical instability, rising inflation, and rising conflicts. Abhyuday Jindal, MD of Jindal Stainless, a third-generation scion, factors out that management wants can range based mostly on an organization’s business and stage of progress. Startups aiming to disrupt the market could require daring risk-takers, whereas mature firms centered on sustaining market place could want extra conservative leaders, he says.
