NEW DELHI: The Mysuru City Growth Authority (MUDA) on Tuesday determined to take again the 14 plots alloted to Karnatak CM Siddaramaiah‘s spouse Parvathi B M. The MUDA has additionally ordered to cancel the sale deed of those plots.
“Smt. Parvathi’s son Dr Yathindra, a MLC, had submitted a letter….now we have gone by way of the provisions in our act. There are provisions in our act to take it when given (again) voluntarily,” MUDA commissioner A N Raghunandan mentioned.
“After consulting panel advocates and the authorized officer, and after figuring out that all the things is right, we arrived at a conclusion.So, now we have ordered to take it again. We now have ordered to cancel the sale deed and handed it over to the sub registrar,” he mentioned to reporters.
Parvathi B M had earlier introduced to return the plots allotted to her after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) booked Siddaramaiah in a cash laundering case, stating that no web site, house, asset and wealth is greater for her than her husband’s respect, dignity, honour and peace of thoughts.
On Monday, the central probe company registered an Enforcement Case Data Report (ECIR), equal to an FIR by police, towards the chief minister over the alleged irregularities in allotment of 14 websites to his spouse by the MUDA.
Earlier, the Lokayukta police on September 27 registered an FIR towards Siddaramaiah, his spouse, brother-in-law Mallikarjuna Swamy, Devaraju — from whom Mallikarjuna Swamy bought land and gifted it to Parvathi — and others, following a Particular Court docket order.
A Particular Court docket Decide, Santhosh Gajanan Bhat, issued an order simply at some point following the Excessive Court docket’s choice to uphold the Governor’s sanction for conducting an investigation towards Siddaramaiah.
The MUDA web site allotment case includes allegations that Siddaramaiah’s spouse obtained 14 compensatory websites in a high-end space of Mysuru (Vijayanagar Structure third and 4th levels). These websites reportedly had a considerably increased property worth in comparison with the placement of her land that MUDA had “acquired.”
“Beneath the controversial scheme, MUDA allotted 50 per cent of developed land to the land losers in lieu of undeveloped land acquired from them for forming residential layouts.”
Parvathi was allotted plots by MUDA beneath a 50:50 ratio scheme in trade for 3.16 acres of her land, which was utilized by MUDA to develop a residential structure. Nevertheless, there are allegations that Parvathi didn’t possess authorized title to this 3.16-acre parcel of land, positioned at survey quantity 464 of Kasare village, Kasaba hobli, Mysuru taluk.
